Notice of Warning
In the matter of Persistence of a Failed Light Source
OffenseNever changing the bulbSeverityStep 1 of 3 · Notice of Warning
In the matter of
Marcus
Respondent · hereinafter “the Occupant”
v.
Upon complaint of
Sarah
Complainant · a member of the household
You are hereby notified that the above-named Respondent has been found, upon evidence gathered over a period of considerable patience, to be in breach of the following provisions:
Provisions breached
- § 25.3aPersistence of failure. Permitting a failed source to remain in place for months.
- § 25.3bAdaptive behavior. Adjusting your habits around the darkness rather than addressing it.
- § 25.3cThe unbought bulb. Passing the correct item in a shop, weekly, without acquiring it.
It is therefore ordered that the Respondent replace the bulb within a week of it failing, effective immediately. You are advised that continued conduct of this nature will be escalated.
Compliance will be monitored. There is no appeals process, and there is no one to appeal to.
This notice is a gift and carries no legal force whatsoever. It is, however, extremely accurate.
detach and keep
Redemption stub · file LIG-8299
Marcus
Scan to answer
You are required to respond. Choose one:
No camera? Go to youvebeenserved.shop
VOID00